Fide rating compared to lichess rapid rating.How much fide strength would a 2200 lichess rapid have?

There really is only one way to find out: actually go play fide rated games. Good luck.

@Fighttilltheend0 said in #10:

Not really 10 +0 gives you a lot of time compared to blitz but in terms of fide it might be half blitz half rapid .

FIDE rapid and FIDE blitz are different from this server.

See the FIDE handbook: https://handbook.fide.com/chapter/B02RBRegulations202210

1. Rate of Play

1.1 For a game to be rated each player must have the following periods in which to complete all the moves:

1.1.1 for a rapid game all the moves must be made in a fixed time of more than 10 minutes but less than 60 minutes for each player; or the time allotted + 60 times any increment must be more than 10 minutes but less than 60 minutes for each player;

1.1.2 for a blitz game all the moves must be made in a fixed time of more than 3 minutes but not more than 10 minutes for each player; or the time allotted + 60 times any increment must be more than 3 minutes but not more than 10 minutes for each player.

1.2 Games where the players have different playing times are not rated.

@Molurus said in #11:

There really is only one way to find out: actually go play fide rated games. Good luck.
Actually I am 1750 Fide but I don't know why most 1700s are 2200 and I am 2300 so I should have more potential right?

Kinda depends. At best all these approximations are at best +-200 points accuracy . SO yes you can be stronger.
I checked my friend from my local club he is bit short 2000 FIDE and shy over 2000 here. So you can spot on as well or way off.

My favorite diagram I have posted way too many times (this question of yours pop up in forums way too often) is
here
https://lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/lichess-rating-to-fide-rating?page=2
From there you can see it is pretty random. A lichess user compiled the actual data and presented it in reddit. I merely linked the image.
This is from days before ratings change but still tells the story clearly. Lichess rating has correlation but is quit low still. And not surprisingly blitz has best correlation.

@petri999 said in #14:

Kinda depends. At best all these approximations are at best +-200 points accuracy . SO yes you can be stronger.
I checked my friend from my local club he is bit short 2000 FIDE and shy over 2000 here. So you can spot on as well or way off.

My favorite diagram I have posted way too many times (this question of yours pop up in forums way too often) is
here
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/lichess-rating-to-fide-rating?page=2
From there you can see it is pretty random. A lichess user compiled the actual data and presented it in reddit. I merely linked the image.
This is from days before ratings change but still tells the story clearly. Lichess rating has correlation but is quit low still. And not surprisingly blitz has best correlation.
Thanks

@Davelz said in #3:

... It would seem that Lichess Rapid ratings 2100, 2205, & 2310 correspond with FIDE 1845, 1940, & 2090.
FIDE = ~(7LichessRapid-3685)/6 = ~LichessRapid - (740/3) ??
(72200-3685)/6=~1953.3

It also depends on which country you're in. Federations with regular FIDE tournaments will often have 1900s who are 2200 in lichess. However in a lot of federations where there are strong players but limited tournament opportunity, especially in Asian countries, 1500-1600 FIDE rated players have 2000+ lichess/chesscom elo. Because 1600-1700 is the new 1900 in these countries, it's pretty difficult to gain elo in tournaments against underrated players.

1900

yeah 1900, maybe 1950

FIDE ratings are weird right now. They did a big adjustment recently. I am USCF 1300 and FIDE 1700 because I went to a FIDE tournament and played a bunch of people who's ratings got bumped up by like 300 points.