- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Lichess Game of the Month: May '25

#2

Congrats to the winner for a great game of chess :D The knight's sure are dangerous when used well >:)

Congrats to the winner for a great game of chess :D The knight's sure are dangerous when used well >:)
#4

W third person to leave a commen!
I find the game to be overrated though as the opponent of the winner just blundered the whole game.
Congrats to the winnner though!

W third person to leave a commen! I find the game to be overrated though as the opponent of the winner just blundered the whole game. Congrats to the winnner though!
#6

Bro the guy just picked his on game
That’s not fair
Also agree to Turtlzz about the game being overrated
Worst Game of the Month ever is May’ 25
But also congrats I guess

Bro the guy just picked his on game That’s not fair Also agree to Turtlzz about the game being overrated Worst Game of the Month ever is May’ 25 But also congrats I guess
#8

he commented his own game, it was picked by the usual people. And it's obvious that there were a lot of mistakes but that makes a game fun and not a strategic and boring thing.

he commented his own game, it was picked by the usual people. And it's obvious that there were a lot of mistakes but that makes a game fun and not a strategic and boring thing.
#9

he commented his own game and it was overrated bro made like 6 blunders

he commented his own game and it was overrated bro made like 6 blunders
#10

Looking at some comments, I decided to clarify some things.
The comment #8 is correct. I submitted my game like everyone else. Not for the first time, these two

https://lichess.org/ePb7ai68#2
and
https://lichess.org/mePscqya
had been my earlier nominations. Judging by the thumbs up in the forum, all those games had chances and the latest one was selected as the Lichess game of the month. (For the first time.) I wasn't among the voters. With myriads of games played and decades of games nominated, there will always be differing opinions.
After my game was selected, I offered to annotate it for free, as someone would do it anyway. So if someone criticizes me for annotating my own game, it feels a bit strange. I annotated it because it had been selected, not the other way around.

Looking at some comments, I decided to clarify some things. The comment #8 is correct. I submitted my game like everyone else. Not for the first time, these two https://lichess.org/ePb7ai68#2 and https://lichess.org/mePscqya had been my earlier nominations. Judging by the thumbs up in the forum, all those games had chances and the latest one was selected as the Lichess game of the month. (For the first time.) I wasn't among the voters. With myriads of games played and decades of games nominated, there will always be differing opinions. After my game was selected, I offered to annotate it for free, as someone would do it anyway. So if someone criticizes me for annotating my own game, it feels a bit strange. I annotated it because it had been selected, not the other way around.