- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Lichess to Chess.com ratings

Someone rated around 2250 blitz at Chess.com, what would their blitz rating be here? Does someone know? Or have an educated guess, I am not expecting an exact answer I am aware is it very subjective.

Someone rated around 2250 blitz at Chess.com, what would their blitz rating be here? Does someone know? Or have an educated guess, I am not expecting an exact answer I am aware is it very subjective.

according to chessgoals' rating comparison guide(1 year old), it should be close to 2300 (+/- 150) for most players.

according to chessgoals' rating comparison guide(1 year old), it should be close to 2300 (+/- 150) for most players.

@Ayushman_C said in #3:

Try chessratings.org/

very inaccruate XD

@Ayushman_C said in #3: > Try chessratings.org/ very inaccruate XD

@iliketowin69 said in #4:

very inaccruate XD
Every such "rating conversion" tool/table/whatever is very inaccurate because the values vary a lot. Therefore it is impossible to say "if your chess-com rating is X, you lichess rating should be Y", the best you can hope for is something like "if you chess-com rating is X, there is a good chance your lichess rating would be between Y-200 and Y+200". But people don't want to hear that and prefer simple formulae, tables and calculators, even if their results are misleading, inaccurate and essentially useless.

@iliketowin69 said in #4: > very inaccruate XD Every such "rating conversion" tool/table/whatever is very inaccurate because the values vary a lot. Therefore it is impossible to say "if your chess-com rating is X, you lichess rating should be Y", the best you can hope for is something like "if you chess-com rating is X, there is a good chance your lichess rating would be between Y-200 and Y+200". But people don't want to hear that and prefer simple formulae, tables and calculators, even if their results are misleading, inaccurate and essentially useless.

@mkubecek said in #5:

Every such "rating conversion" tool/table/whatever is very inaccurate because the values vary a lot. Therefore it is impossible to say "if your chess-com rating is X, you lichess rating should be Y", the best you can hope for is something like "if you chess-com rating is X, there is a good chance your lichess rating would be between Y-200 and Y+200". But people don't want to hear that and prefer simple formulae, tables and calculators, even if their results are misleading, inaccurate and essentially useless.

the disparity between my ratings is about 400-600 points in some cases. Its pretty bad, i don't recommend using.

There is no 'real formula' as ratings from the bottom and from the top are super inflated.

This predicts 2700 bullet on lichess=2900 bullet on chess.com. Mostly inaccurate imo!

@mkubecek said in #5: > Every such "rating conversion" tool/table/whatever is very inaccurate because the values vary a lot. Therefore it is impossible to say "if your chess-com rating is X, you lichess rating should be Y", the best you can hope for is something like "if you chess-com rating is X, there is a good chance your lichess rating would be between Y-200 and Y+200". But people don't want to hear that and prefer simple formulae, tables and calculators, even if their results are misleading, inaccurate and essentially useless. the disparity between my ratings is about 400-600 points in some cases. Its pretty bad, i don't recommend using. There is no 'real formula' as ratings from the bottom and from the top are super inflated. This predicts 2700 bullet on lichess=2900 bullet on chess.com. Mostly inaccurate imo!

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.